[ntpwg] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt]

[David L. Mills]

Brian,

You might insert a note that the C&M specification will be the subject 
of a companion document. THe idea is to let the reader know this issue 
has not been forgotten.

Dave

Brian Haberman wrote:

>
> Danny Mayer wrote:
>
>> Brian Haberman wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> This -06 version *should* be very close to complete. Please
>>> provide any feedback on issues found with it. This version does not
>>> contain the control and monitoring specification. The chairs have
>>> decided to provide that in a separate internet-draft.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Brian
>>>
>> That's okay as long as the NTP packet modes are defined in this draft
>> unless you want the separate draft as extending this draft.
>>
>
> My thought was to leave section 3 of the protocol spec as is and have
> the new control/monitoring spec refer to this one.
>
> If you know of any other referential issues with having the control spec
> separate, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg at support.ntp.org
> https://support.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://support.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/attachments/20070601/8ac25722/attachment.html