[ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) Optionsfor DHCPv6
Ted Lemon
mellon at fugue.com
Mon Nov 26 00:16:58 GMT 2007
On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:20 PM, TS Glassey wrote:
> You mean the DHCP lease? True unless the connection is forced to be
> renewed.
> Otherwise, as long as the connection is in place one would think its
> proper
> to have the service address remain the same.
This is a very frustrating discussion. Do you guys ever actually use
DHCP in operation? Connections aren't "forced to be renewed." DHCP
clients renew their leases periodically. It's possible to set up a
DHCP server to give out a lease that doesn't need to be renewed, but
nobody ever does that. Even if some random person at one site
somewhere does it, they're not going to have enough clients to cause
you trouble - it's only a large site that will cause you trouble, and
trust me, they can't operate their network without regular lease
renewals.
So in practice, for any significant source of NTP traffic, you are
going to have DHCP lease renewals. There aren't going to be any
exceptions to this.
Furthermore, for clients that only do the lightweight DHCP protocol,
there is a required refresh interval. So again, this simply isn't a
problem.
More information about the ntpwg
mailing list