[ntpwg] NTP WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-10.txt

[David L. Mills]

Danny,
I think you mean the formula on p. 29

delta = T(ABA) = (T4-T1) - (T3-T2)

This is the first mention of T4 in a formul. That formula is correct.

Dave

Danny Mayer wrote:

> I have reviewed the document and believe it's ready for advancement. I
> have a couple of nits (mainly word corrections) below but I that
> shouldn't hold up advancement.
>
> P17. Figure 6
> VERSION should be described as "NTP version number" (add NTP)
>
> P17. Section 7.3. First paragraph
> Last word refers to the RFC as a report. Replace "report" with "RFC".
>
> P26 Section 8 Paragraph 2
> At end of paragraph please add the sentence "Any other non-allocated
> multicast address may also be used in addition to these allocated
> multicast addresses.
>
>
> P26 Section 8 first full paragraph at top of page
> This doesn't look quite right to me. If (T4-T1) is 64 seconds that's a
> huge delay in getting a response. Is this right or am I misunderstanding
> the whole paragraph?
>
> P56. Section 16.
> Replace the following:
> "IANA is requested to establish and maintain a registry for Extension
> Field Types associated with this protocol, populating this registry with
> no initial entries."
> with:
> "IANA is requested to establish and maintain a registry for Extension
> Field Types associated with this protocol, populating this registry
> reserving Field Types 0-7 for the autokey protocol (see RFC xxxx)."
>
> or is that done with the Autokey protocol document?
>
> Danny
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg