[ntpwg] WG Last Call : draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-04.txt

[Brian Haberman]

Heiko,
      For number assignments such as this, IANA will perform a review 
and assign a number after we advance the document to the IESG.

Regards,
Brian

Heiko Gerstung wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> sorry for kicking in late :) AFAICS the last call period has ended and 
> no one brought up anything that would prevent the draft from moving 
> forward, right?
> 
> For my implementation stuff I would like to get the XXXX out of the MIB 
> and replace it with a correctly IANA assigned number instead. Since that 
> assignment is mandatory in any case I would vote for speeding this up 
> and let some organization (e.g. the ISC or the IETF if that is possible) 
> take the required steps to register this number with IANA as soon as 
> possible.
> 
> At the moment the draft contains the XXXX placeholder and a note to the 
> RFC Editor that says that this has to be replaced with the IANA assigned 
> number once it is available.
> 
> Regards,
> Heiko
> 
> 
> Brian Haberman schrieb:
>> Hi Harlen,
>>       Given the usual RFC process, there should be plenty of time for 
>> any issues that Heiko may encounter to be incorporated into the spec.  
>> I don't see a reason to wait.  Plus, someone's WG Last Call review may 
>> discover something prior to Heiko finding it in the implementation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>>
>> Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>  
>>> Brian & Karen wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>>       This note starts an NTP Working Group Last Call for the NTP 
>>>> MIB (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-04.txt) as a Proposed Standard.  
>>>> Substantial comments should be directed to the NTP mailing list.  
>>>> Editorial comments should be directed to the document editors.  This 
>>>> Last Call will end on June 20, 2008.
>>>>       
>>> Heiko is in the process of implementing an NTP MIB agent.
>>>
>>> I'm *just asking* - would there be benefit to holding off on the Last
>>> Call for a bit longer to make sure that during implementation he doesn't
>>> find anything that needs to be clarified or changed?
>>>
>>> H
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> ntpwg mailing list
>> ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
>> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg
>>