[ntpwg] Pending NTP WG Last Call on Autokey

[TS Glassey]

Yep - and I am working with the GAO to integrate these requirement's into
the brand-new version of FISCAM which the GAO is running out for comment's
to the CIO's offices of the various Federal Agencies.

This is a good listing from LEXIS-NEXIS, and I can send you a copy of the 
ruling if you want to see it itself.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/applieddiscovery/LawLibrary/whitePapers/ADI_WP_LorraineVMarkel.pdf

A broad Google search produces a wealth of info there. But what people need 
to realize here is that there is a key value in a strong NTP as a core 
evidence source in IT systems. And that is what needs particular focus here 
IMHO.



Todd

http://www.google.com/search?q=Lorraine+v+Markel&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GGLF




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Seaman" <seaman at noao.edu>
To: "NTP Working Group" <ntpwg at lists.ntp.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Pending NTP WG Last Call on Autokey


> TS Glassey wrote:
>
>> the Court Ruling from the US District Court in Lorraine V Markel (by
>> Judge Paul W. Grimm on May 4th 2007) set the standard for what
>> digital content and first-person v third-person type testimony models.
>
> Thanks for the interesting reference.  Is this online somewhere?  I'll
> simply echo Dave's questions.
>
> Rob Seaman
> NOAO
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg